Tampa 
W-L: (11- 1) PR = 99.1869
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
130 H Florida Tech SSC ( 7- 2, 96.5) 10- 6
201 H Newberry SAC ( 9- 2, 96.7) 15-12
207 A Lenoir-Rhyne SAC ( 5- 3, 96.5) 13-10
214 A Flagler PBC ( 8- 4, 95.5) 8- 7
221 H Rockhurst GLVC ( 8- 3, 95.5) 13- 6
225 H Concordia-Irvine RMAC ( 4- 5, 91.9) 17- 7
228 H Maryville GLVC ( 8- 2, 96.0) 14- 3
307 A Anderson (SC) SAC ( 8- 2, 96.7) 13-14
314 H Montevallo PBC ( 5- 7, 92.4) 18- 7
315 H Colorado Mesa RMAC ( 7- 2, 95.6) 12- 6
321 H Florida Southern SSC ( 2- 7, 92.8) 14- 7
328 A Embry-Riddle SSC ( 5- 4, 94.2) 16- 6
401 A Palm Beach Atlantic SSC ( 5- 6, 92.1)
404 H Rollins SSC ( 5- 4, 96.3)
408 A St Leo SSC ( 6- 3, 96.0)
411 H Lynn SSC ( 2- 5, 92.5)
415 A Florida Tech SSC ( 7- 2, 96.5)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
130 H Florida Tech 10- 6 4 3 0.95
201 H Newberry 15-12 3 3 0.11
207 A Lenoir-Rhyne 13-10 3 2 0.70
214 A Flagler 8- 7 1 3 - -2.31
221 H Rockhurst 13- 6 7 4 0.92
225 H Concordia-Irvine 17- 7 10 8 0.00
228 H Maryville 14- 3 11 4 1.45
307 A Anderson (SC) 13-14 -1 2 - -3.15
314 H Montevallo 18- 7 11 7 0.00
315 H Colorado Mesa 12- 6 6 4 1.02
321 H Florida Southern 14- 7 7 7 0.00
328 A Embry-Riddle 16- 6 10 5 0.36
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
214 A Flagler 8- 7 1 3 - -2.31
307 A Anderson (SC) 13-14 -1 2 - -3.15
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
|
Tampa Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Adams State |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   4- 0 vs 0- 4 |
|
| Adelphi |
Adelphi |
|
 
| Adelphi |
| Alabama-Huntsville |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   4- 0 vs 0- 4 |
|
| American International |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Anderson (SC) |
Anderson (SC) |
Anderson (SC) |
 
| |
| Assumption |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Barton |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Belmont Abbey |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Tampa |
| Bentley |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Bridgeport |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Caldwell |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Catawba |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) |
Tampa |
| Chestnut Hill |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Chowan |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Coker |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Tampa |
| Colorado Mesa |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Concordia-Irvine |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| D'Youville |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Davenport |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Davis & Elkins |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| District of Columbia |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Dominican (CA) |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Dominican (NY) |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Embry-Riddle |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Emmanuel (GA) |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Emory & Henry |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Tampa |
| Felician |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Flagler |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Florida Southern |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Florida Tech |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Franklin Pierce |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Frostburg State |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Georgian Court |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Holy Family |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Indianapolis |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Lake Erie |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Lander |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
| Lees-McRae |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
| Lenoir-Rhyne |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Lewis |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Tampa |
| Limestone |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Lincoln Memorial |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Tampa |
| Lynn |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Malone |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Mars Hill |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   3- 1 vs 0- 4 |
|
| Maryville |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Mercy |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Molloy |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Montevallo |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Mount Olive |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Tampa |
| Newberry |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| North Greenville |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
| Northwood |
Tampa |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Tampa |
| Pace |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Palm Beach Atlantic |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   4- 0 vs 1- 3 |
|
| Post |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Quincy |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Tampa |
| Roberts Wesleyan |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Rockhurst |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Rollins |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   5- 0 vs 2- 3 |
|
| Seton Hill |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Shorter |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Southern New Hampshire |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| St Anselm |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| St Leo |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) |
Tampa |
| St Michaels |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| St Thomas Aquinas |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Thomas More |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Tampa |
| Tiffin |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Tusculum |
Tampa |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Tampa |
| Virginia State |
Tampa |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Tampa |
| Walsh |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Westminster (UT) |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   4- 0 vs 1- 3 |
|
| Wheeling |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| William Jewell |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Wilmington (DE) |
Tampa |
|
 
| Tampa |
| Wingate |
Tampa |
|
tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) |
Tampa |
| Young Harris |
Tampa |
|
Tampa   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
PowerWise = 76

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.19
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Florida Tech ( 7- 2, 96.5) 10- 6 -3.40 19.15 -0.36 0.77 14.39
0 H Newberry ( 9- 2, 96.7) 15-12 -3.24 19.32 -0.36 0.77 14.51
0 A Lenoir-Rhyne ( 5- 3, 96.5) 13-10 -3.38 19.18 0.36 0.77 14.96
0 A Flagler ( 8- 4, 95.5) 8- 7 -4.38 18.17 0.36 0.77 14.19
0 H Rockhurst ( 8- 3, 95.5) 13- 6 -4.43 18.13 -0.36 0.77 13.60
0 H Concordia-Irvi ( 4- 5, 91.9) 17- 7 -7.95 14.60 -0.36 0.77 10.90
0 H Maryville ( 8- 2, 96.0) 14- 3 -3.90 18.65 -0.36 0.77 14.01
0 A Anderson (SC) ( 8- 2, 96.7) 13-14 -3.22 19.33 0.36 0.77 -2.19
0 H Montevallo ( 5- 7, 92.4) 18- 7 -7.52 15.03 -0.36 0.77 11.23
0 H Colorado Mesa ( 7- 2, 95.6) 12- 6 -4.33 18.22 -0.36 0.77 13.68
0 H Florida Southe ( 2- 7, 92.8) 14- 7 -7.10 15.46 -0.36 0.77 11.56
0 A Embry-Riddle ( 5- 4, 94.2) 16- 6 -5.72 16.83 0.36 0.77 13.17
------
144.01
|
winning pts = 146.2056 losing points = -2.1906
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------